减氮控释掺混肥对鲜食玉米氮利用效率及产量的影响

Effects of reducing controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency and yield of fresh maize

  • 摘要: 通过田间试验探索控释掺混肥代替部分化肥对鲜食玉米产量、氮肥利用效率及土壤硝态氮含量等的影响,为化肥减施增效提供依据。为保证试验结果在北京市范围内的可推广性,选取位于密云和平谷的2块中肥力地块(地块A、地块B)开展试验,探索土温和降雨对肥料氮释放的影响,同时设置不施氮肥(CK),常规施肥(OPT,推荐施肥量),控释掺混肥1(CRU1,施肥量同OPT),控释掺混肥2(CRU2,较OPT减氮10%),控释掺混肥3(CRU3,较OPT减氮20%)共五个处理,分析鲜食玉米的产量、氮素累积量、氮肥利用效率、经济效益及土壤硝态氮含量等。结果表明:各处理的鲜穗产量顺序为:CRU1>CRU2、CRU3、OPT>CK,其中以CRU1的鲜穗产量最高,比CRU2、CRU3高750 ~ 758 kg·hm−2、1 500 ~ 1 667 kg·hm−2;同时与OPT相比,CRU均可提高鲜穗的产量,地块A和地块B分别增产3.15% ~ 17.1% 和 3.54% ~ 10.1%。各处理的增收顺序为:CRU1>CRU2>CRU3>OPT>CK,其中以CRU1的净收入最高,分别比CRU2、CRU3高3 690 ~ 3 762元(地块A)、7 470 ~ 8 273元(地块B),同时与OPT相比,CRU均可提高净收入,分别增加5.75% ~ 12.8%(地块A)、5.31% ~ 20.2%(地块B)。与OPT相比,CRU能不同程度提高鲜食玉米的氮肥利用效率,其中氮肥回收率、氮肥偏生产力均以CRU3处理与OPT处理的差值最大,而氮肥农学效率以CRU1与OPT的差值最大。综上说明,与普通尿素分次施用相比,控释掺混肥一次性减氮施用可以提高鲜穗产量,获得种植收益,同时还能提高氮肥利用效率,以等氮180 kg(N)·hm−2施用获得的鲜穗产量及收益最高。本研究中0 ~ 20 cm土层的硝态氮含量,CRU在24 d出现峰值为83.0 ~ 105 mg·kg−1(地块A)> 67.9 ~ 79.1 mg·kg−1(地块B),这是由于地块B的更高土温和更强降雨导致控释氮前期释放过多,故地块A的峰值高于地块B;OPT在48 d(追肥期)再次出现峰值,地块B表现为OPT > CRU,地块A在两处理间无显著差异,这表明地块A的土温和降水相对保证了控释氮的缓慢释放,保证了作物后期的供氮量。同时,20 ~ 60 cm土层也出现了类似的变化规律,说明硝态氮出现了向深层土壤下渗的淋溶风险。

     

    Abstract: To seek a scientific pattern for reducing fertilization in Beijing, we conducted a field experiment with reduced controlled-release blended fertilizer replacing chemical nitrogen fertilizer, and analyzed its effects on of fresh maize yield, nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency and soil nitrate nitrogen. To ensure the extension of the experimental within Beijing and understand the effects of soil temperature and rainfall on controlled-release nitrogen, we selected two medium fertility plots in Pinggu and Miyun (called plot A and plot B) with five nitrogen (N) treatments: no fertilizer (CK), recommended fertilization (OPT), 3 controlled -release blended fertilizer levels (CRU1, CRU2, CRU3, which denotes 0, 10% and 20% reduction of N rate based on OPT, respectively). We investigated fresh maize yield, economic benefit, nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency, nitrogen accumulation amount and soil nitrate nitrogen. The results showed that, the yield of fresh maize was in the order of CRU1>CRU2, CRU3, OPT>CK, and CRU1 had the highest yield. The yield of CRU was 750 – 758 kg·hm−2 (plot A) and 1 500 – 1667 kg·hm−2 (plot B) higher than that of CRU2 and CRU3, and increased 3.15% – 17.1% (plot A) and 3.54% – 10.1% (plot B) compared with OPT, respectively. The income was in the order CRU1>CRU2>CRU3>OPT>CK, and CRU1 had the highest income, the profit of CRU1 was 3 690 − 3762 yuan (plot A), 7 470 – 8273 yuan (plot B) higher than that of CRU2 and CRU3, and increased 5.75% – 12.8% (plot A) and 5.31% – 20.2% (plot B) compared with OPT, respectively. CRU treatments improved the nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency compared with OPT; the difference between CRU3 and OPT was with the largest recovery efficiency of N and partical-factor productivity of N; the difference between CRU1 and OPT was with the largest agronomic efficiency of N. These results indicated that compared with urea multi-fertilization, the controlled-release blended fertilizer single application improved the yield of fresh maize, increased income and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency, while application of 180 kg(N)·hm−2 reached the highest yield and income. In this study, the soil nitrate nitrogen in 0 – 20 cm layer, the peak of CRU was with 83.0 – 105 mg·kg−1 (plot A) > 67.9 – 79.1 mg·kg−1 (plot B) within 24th day, and the peak in plot A was higher than that in plot B due to the higher soil temperature and stronger rainfall in plot B resulted in excessive and early release of controlled-release nitrogen. The peak of OPT appeared again on the 48th day, and plot B was in the order of OPT > CRU, there were no difference between these two treatments in plot A; which indicated that soil temperature and rainfall in plot A relatively ensured the slow release of controlled-release nitrogen, the nitrogen supply in the later period of crop was ensured. 20 – 60 cm soil layer had the similar pattern, indicating a leaching risk of nitrate nitrogen into the deep soil.

     

/

返回文章
返回